نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری معماری، گروه معماری، واحد پروفسور حسابی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تفرش، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه معماری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه معماری، واحد پروفسور حسابی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تفرش، ایران.

10.22061/jsaud.2025.11278.2262

چکیده

مقدمه: تأثیر مثبت سکونتگاه‌های انسانی همساز با طبیعت بر ارتقا رفاه و سلامت روانی و جسمانی افراد به اثبات رسیده است و حوزه روان‌شناسی محیطی فهم هرچه بهتر این تأثیر مثبت را تسهیل کرده است. با این‌حال این که ابعاد و اصول روان‌شناسی محیطی شامل چه مواردی است و ازسویی چه ویژگی‌هایی از سکونتگاه‌های همساز با طبیعت بر روان‌شناسی محیطی مؤثرند، نیازمند بحث‌وبررسی بیشتری است. به همین منظور هدف این پژوهش، ارائه چارچوبی جامع از ابعاد روان‌شناسی محیطی و ارزیابی میزان تحقق آن در سکونتگاه‌های همساز با طبیعت، به‌منظور شناسایی دقیق عوامل مؤثر بر سلامت روانی و اجتماعی ساکنان در این نوع از سکونتگاه‌هاست.
روش تحقیق: به همین منظور این پژوهش با یک روش‌شناسی ترکیبی ابتدا در بخش کیفی به تحلیل محتوای قیاسی پژوهش‌های مرتبط با روان‌شناسی محیطی پرداخته و ابعاد و شاخص‌های روان‌شناسی محیطی را شناسایی کرده است. سپس در بخش کمی اصول به‌دست‌آمده را به یک پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته تبدیل و آنها را در ماسوله تکمیل کرده است. داده‌های پرسشنامه در نرم‌افزار SPSS و با شاخص‌های پراکندگی (میانگین و انحراف معیار) و آزمون تی‌تک نمونه‌ای تحلیل شده است.
نتایج و بحث: طبق نتایج پژوهش، ابعاد روان‌شناسی محیطی به ترتیب از رتبه اول تا ششم شامل ادراکات محیطی، احساسات فردی، سلامت جسم و روان، توانمندسازی فردی، جهان فرهنگی - اجتماعی و محدوده و حریم شخصی در ماسوله معنادار شده‌اند و طبق آزمون تی‌تک نمونه‌ای، روان‌شناسی محیطی با میانگین اکتسابی 4.09 (بالاتر از 3) وضعیت مطلوبی در ماسوله دارد.
نتیجه‌گیری: بر اساس یافته‌های پژوهش و شاخص‌های پراکندگی، تمام ابعاد روان‌شناسی محیطی در ماسوله بالاتر از میانگین جامعه بود. همچنین طبق نتیجه آزمون تی‌تک نمونه‌ای، میانگین اکتسابی تحقق اصول روان‌شناسی محیطی 1.09 بالاتر از میانگین و این یافته نیز حاکی از کیفیت مطلوب ماسوله از منظر روان‌شناسی محیطی است.

چکیده تصویری

سنجش میزان تحقق شاخص های روان شناسی محیطی درسکونتگاه های انسانی، همساز با طبیعت (موردپژوهی: ماسوله)

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessing the Realization of Environmental Psychology Indicators in Nature-Compatible Human Settlements: Case Study of Masuleh

نویسندگان [English]

  • Parisa Haddadi 1
  • saiid mirriahi 2
  • Susan Habib 3

1 PhD Candidate in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Professor Hesabi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tafresh, Iran

2 . Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Shahid Beheshti University,

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Professor Hesabi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tafresh, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction:

The positive impact of nature-oriented human settlements on the enhancement of individuals' physical and psychological well-being has been well-established. The field of environmental psychology facilitates a deeper understanding of this positive influence. However, a comprehensive exploration of the dimensions and principles of environmental psychology and their connection to the characteristics of nature-oriented settlements requires further investigation. This study aims to present a comprehensive framework of environmental psychology dimensions and evaluate their realization in nature-oriented settlements, specifically identifying key factors influencing the mental and social health of residents in such environments.

Methodology:

This mixed-methods research initially employs qualitative analysis to identify dimensions and indicators of environmental psychology through deductive content analysis of relevant studies. Subsequently, a researcher-designed questionnaire based on the identified principles is administered in Masuleh. The collected data are analyzed using SPSS software with dispersion indicators (mean and standard deviation) and the one-sample t-test.

Findings and Discussion:

The study results rank the dimensions of environmental psychology from highest to lowest in Masuleh as follows: environmental perceptions, individual emotions, physical and mental health, personal empowerment, cultural-social world, and personal boundaries. Based on the one-sample t-test, environmental psychology in Masuleh demonstrates a favorable status, with an obtained mean score of 4.09 (above the neutral score of 3).

Conclusion:

According to the research findings and dispersion indicators, all dimensions of environmental psychology in Masuleh are above the societal mean. The results of the one-sample t-test indicate an average score 1.09 higher than the societal mean, suggesting the high quality of Masuleh from the perspective of environmental psychology.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Environmental Psychology
  • Mixed-Methods Research
  • Masuleh
  • Dispersion Indicators
  • One-Sample T-Test
#Abass, K., & Serbeh, R. (2023). Public perceptions of the health benefits of green spaces in urban Ghana. Local Environment, 28, 967 - 978.
Abdelaal, M. S., & Soebarto, V. (2019). Biophilia and Salutogenesis as restorative design approaches in healthcare architecture. Architectural Science Review, 62(3), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1604313
Afacan, Y. (2023). Impacts of biophilic design on the development of Gero transcendence and the Profile of Mood States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ageing and Society, 43(11), 2580-2604. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21001860
Alexander, D., & Wydeman, B. (2020). The Intersection and Divergence of New Urbanism and Environmental Psychology: An Exploration. Frontiers in Built Environment, 6, 61-61. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00061
Aliabadi, M. A., Behzadeh Behbahani, A., & Hosseinpour Naderi, H. (2010). Investigating Environmental Psychology Indicators in the Design of Student Dormitories[in persian].
Almusaed, A. (2011). Biophilic and bioclimatic architecture: Analytical therapy for the next generation of passive sustainable architecture. Springer Science & Business Media.
Almusaed, A., & Almusaed, A. (2011). Socio and Healthy Human Psychology upon Biophilic Architecture. Biophilic and Bioclimatic Architecture: Analytical Therapy for the Next Generation of Passive Sustainable Architecture, 173-186.
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy. Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding, 45.
Amini, E., Toghiyani, Sh., & Shabani, A. H. (2023). Explaining the Components of Urban Space for the Elderly with an Environmental Psychology Approach (Case Study: District 8 of Shiraz). Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 23(68), 403–426. SID: https://sid.ir/paper/968480/fa[in persian].
Anzani, A., & Caramel, C. (2020). Design and Restoration.
Arbani, E. (2001). Gilan Book (Vol. 1). Iranian Research Group[in persian].
Arendt, R. G., Harper, H. W., & Trust, N. L. (1996). Conservation Design for Subdivisions: A Practical Guide To Creating Open Space Networks.
Aristizabal, S., Byun, K., Porter, P., Clements, N., Campanella, C., Li, L., Mullan, A., Ly, S., Senerat, A., & Nenadic, I. Z. (2021). Biophilic office design: Exploring the impact of a multisensory approach on human well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, 101682.
Asim, F., & Shree, V. (2019). The impact of Biophilic Built Environment on Psychological Restoration within student hostels. Visions for Sustainability, 2019(12), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/3534
Asim, F., Rai, S., & Shree, V. (2021). Biophilic architecture for restoration and therapy within the built environment: a review.
Austin, M. E., & Kaplan, R. (2003). Resident involvement in natural resource management: Open space conservation design in practice. Local Environment, 8(2), 141-153.
Barton, J., Hine, R., & Pretty, J. (2009). The health benefits of walking in greenspaces of high natural and heritage value. Journal of integrative environmental sciences, 6(4), 261-278.
Beinhocker, E. D. (2023). Biophilic markets. Daedalus, 152(1), 94-99.
Berto, R. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 394-409. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040394
Berto, R., Barbiero, G., & Pasini, M. (2016). Biophilic Design Triggers Fascination and Enhances Psychological Restoration in the Urban Environment Biophilic design; restorative design View project Nuova Architettura Sensibile Alpina View project. Journal of Biourbanism, 1(June), 25-34.
Brielmann, A. A., Buras, N. H., Salingaros, N. A., & Taylor, R. P. (2022). What happens in your brain when you walk down the street? Implications of architectural proportions, biophilia, and fractal geometry for urban science. Urban Science, 6(1), 3.
Brondino, M., Pasini, M., Rita, T., & Zeno, F. (2021). Environmental Psychology and Participatory Interior Design: a case study. ICEP 2021 International Conference on Environmental Psychology,
Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62(3), 193.
Casper, A. M. A., Fernández-Giménez, M. E., & Balgopal, M. M. (2020). A tool for measuring ecological literacy: coupled human-ecosystem interactions. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 27, 21 - 34.
Chen, H., Yan, W., Li, Z., Wende, W., & Xiao, S. (2023). A framework for integrating ecosystem service provision and connectivity in ecological spatial networks: A case study of the Shanghai metropolitan area. Sustainable Cities and Society.
Cook, D. J., & Krishnan, N. (2014). Mining the home environment. Journal of intelligent information systems, 43, 503-519.
Crewe, K., & Forsyth, A. (2011). Compactness and connection in environmental design: insights from ecoburbs and ecocities for design with nature. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(2), 267-288.
Daneshpour, S. A., Mahdavinia, M., & Ghiaei, M. M. (2009). The Role of Environmental Psychology Knowledge in High-Rise Buildings with a Sustainable Architecture Approach. Urban Identity, 3(5), 29–38. SID: https://sid.ir/paper/154655/fa[in persian].
Dioba, A., Kroker, V., Dewitte, S., & Lange, F. (2024). Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior Change: A Review of Qualitative Research. Sustainability.
Douglas, O., Russell, P., & Scott, M. (2019). Positive perceptions of green and open space as predictors of neighbourhood quality of life: implications for urban planning across the city region. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62, 626 - 646.
Doyle, D. F. (2004). Planning for Greener Development: Conservation Development and Landon Bay East.
E.V Wuisang, C., M Rondonuwu, D., L.E Sela, R., Tilaar, S., & Suryono, S. (2023). Characteristics of Public Green Open Spaces and Efforts In Enhancing The Quality and Function Using Tri-Valent Approach: Case of Manado City, Indonesia. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies.
Estaji, H. (2017). A review of flexibility and adaptability in housing design. International Journal of Contemporary Architecture, 4(2), 37-49.
Feinberg, D., & Hostetler, M. (2015). Conservation Subdivision: Post-construction Phase—Policy Directions and the Importance of Assessing Stakeholder Opinions: WEC356/UW401, 12/2014. EDIS, 2015(2), 5-5.
Gaiser, E. E., Bell, D. M., Castorani, M. C. N., Childers, D. L., Groffman, P. M., Jackson, C. R., Kominoski, J. S., Peters, D. P., Pickett, S. T. A., Ripplinger, J., & Zinnert, J. C. (2020). Long-Term Ecological Research and Evolving Frameworks of Disturbance Ecology. BioScience, 70, 141-156.
Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice.
Gifford, R. (2009). Environmental psychology: Manifold visions, unity of purpose. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 387-389.
Gifford, R. (2012). Environmental Psychology. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior: Second Edition, 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00150-6
Güngör, B. Ş. (2020). Do Green Building Standards Meet the Biophilic Design Strategies? Journal of Design Studio, 2(1), 5-23.
Hägerhäll, C. M., Laike, T., Küller, M., Marcheschi, E., Boydston, C., & Taylor, R. P. (2015). Human physiological benefits of viewing nature: EEG responses to exact and statistical fractal patterns. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 19(1), 1-12.
Hartig, T. (2004). What Nature to Save? and Why? Thoughts on Experiential Bases of Sustainability.
Hobohm, C. (2021). Environmental Indicators and Biodiversity Conservation Strategies.
Holahan, C. J. (1982). Environmental psychology. (No Title).
Holden, C. (1977). Ian McHarg: champion for design with nature. Science, 195(4276), 379-382.
Hung, S. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2022). How do humans value urban nature? Developing the perceived biophilic design scale (PBDs) for preference and emotion. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 76, 127730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127730
Hung, S.-H., & Chang, C.-Y. (2021). Health benefits of evidence-based biophilic-designed environments: A review. Journal of People, Plants, and Environment, 24(1), 1-16.
Inglese, G., Lorenzo Mura, A., Alves, S., Bonaiuto, M., & Villani, T. (2023). Biophilic design for remote studying environments: analysis of case studies involving a collaboration between ergonomics and environmental psychology. Connectivity and creativity in times of conflict, 98-98. https://doi.org/10.26530/9789401496476-020
Irvine, K., Likitswat, F., Sahavacharin, A., Suwanarit, A., Lertwarapornpong, T., & Chitwatkulsiri, D. (2023). The Agrihood Design: Valuation of Ecosystem Services for NbS Visions in Peri-urban Housing Estate Development, Bangkok, Thailand. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS).
Ives-Dewey, D., & Fitz-Patrick, D. (2009). Conservation Design in Chester County, Pennsylvania: Assessing Preservation Outcomes. The Pennsylvania Geographer, 47(2), 72.
Jaffar, M., Rais, A., & Latiff, A. (2024). Pro-Environmental Conservation Behavior Through the Lens of Norm Activation Model: A Systematic Review (2018–2023). PaperASIA.
Jaheen, N., & El-Darwish, I. (2021). Biophilic Design Elements in Modern Buildings Influenced By Islamic Architecture Features. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 0(0), 0-0. https://doi.org/10.21608/jesaun.2021.102832.1085
Jangjou, Sh., Zarrabadi, S., Ziyari, Y. A., & Bandarabad, A. (2019). Explaining a Model of Urban Wayfinding with an Environmental Psychology Approach (Case Study: 11 Pedestrian Corridors of Tehran). New Attitudes in Human Geography, 11(4), 561–579. SID: https://sid.ir/paper/519267/fa[in persian].
Jegede, O. E., & Taki, A. (2022). Optimization of building envelopes using indigenous materials to achieve thermal comfort and affordable housing in Abuja, Nigeria. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 40(2), 219-247.
Jiang, Y., & Swallow, S. K. (2015). Providing an ecologically sound community landscape at the urban–rural fringe: A conceptual, integrated model. Journal of Land Use Science, 10(3), 323-341.
Joye, Y. (2007). Architectural Lessons From Environmental Psychology: The Case of Biophilic Architecture. Review of General Psychology, 11(4), 305-328. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.305
Kabinesh, V., Vennila, S., Baranidharan, K., Ravi, R., Krishnamoorthi, S., & Thirunavukkarasu, M. (2024). Sustainable Spaces-The Evolution of Biophilic Design in Modern Architecture: A Review. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology, 23(5), 64-77.
Karaca, E., & Karaca, M. (2021). Environmental Psychology Approaches Within the Relationship of Nature and Health in terms of Landscape Architecture. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 18(42), 5781-5802. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.910271
Keller, B. E. (1997). Improving Open-space Subdivisions in Charlton, Massachusetts: Connecting Back to the Land.
Kühn, T., & Bobeth, S. (2022). Linking environmental psychology and critical social psychology: Theoretical considerations toward a comprehensive research agenda. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 947243-947243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947243
Lahman, A. S., Aly, S. J., & Flener, S. S. (2023). Board 1: WIP: Biophilic Design and Its Effects on Mental and Physical Health. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,
Lei, Q., Yuan, C., & Lau, S. S. Y. (2021). A quantitative study for indoor workplace biophilic design to improve health and productivity performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129168
Levin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, Method and reality in social equilibria and social change.
Li, H. (2023). Spatial Hierarchies: Enlightenment to Space Syntax Theory. Advances in Economics and Management Research, 6(1), 438-438.
Lobo, L., Heras-Escribano, M., & Travieso, D. (2018). The history and philosophy of ecological psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(NOV), 403987-403987. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02228
Luoni, S. (2019). Building Smarter Infrastructure: Resource Productivity in a Residential Development for Steinhatchee, Florida.
Lynch, A. J. J. (2018). Creating Effective Urban Greenways and Stepping-stones: Four Critical Gaps in Habitat Connectivity Planning Research. Journal of Planning Literature, 34, 131 - 155.
MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 992-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010
Marchand, D., Weiss, K., & Pol, E. (2023). 100 Key Concepts in Environmental Psychology.
Martínez-Soto, J., de la Fuente Suárez, L. A., & Ruiz-Correa, S. (2021). Exploring the links between biophilic and restorative qualities of exterior and interior spaces in Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 717116.
Matlabi, G. (2001). Environmental Psychology: A New Knowledge in the Service of Architecture and Urban Design. Fine Arts, (10), 52–67. SID: https://sid.ir/paper/5650/fa[in persian].
Mijatov Ladičorbić, M., Dragin, A. S., Surla, T., Tešin, A., Amezcua-Ogáyar, J. M., Calahorro-López, A., Stojanović, V., Zadel, Z., Košić, K., Ivanović, O. M., Džigurski, A. I., Vujičić, M. D., Knežević, M. N., Bibić, L. I., Tomić, S., & Anđelković, Ž. (2024). Towards Healthy and Sustainable Human Settlement: Understanding How Local Communities Perceive and Engage with Spa Tourism Development Initiatives in Rural Areas. Land.
Mirza Mohammadi, A., Bagherzadeh Kaseiri, Sh., & Zeinali Azim, A. (2020). Analyzing the Design and Architecture of Sustainable Residential Complexes Emphasizing Environmental Psychology and Sense of Place (Case Study: Asman Towers, Tabriz). Architectural Thought, 4(8), 105–119. SID: https://sid.ir/paper/399370/fa[in persian].
Mishra, A. S. K. (2018). Biophilic Architecture-Importance and advantages.
Mohammadpour, A. (2011). Research Designs Using Mixed Methods: Paradigmatic Principles and Technical Methods. Iranian Journal of Social Studies, 4(2), 81–107. http://www.jss-isa.ir/article_23401_9dff8bcf5e220c63e649b54b9d51e00d.pdf[in persian].
Monteiro, R., Ferreira, J. C., & Antunes, P. (2020). Green Infrastructure Planning Principles: An Integrated Literature Review. Land.
Morri, E., & Santolini, R. (2021). Ecosystem Services Valuation for the Sustainable Land Use Management by Nature-Based Solution (NbS) in the Common Agricultural Policy Actions: A Case Study on the Foglia River Basin (Marche Region, Italy). Land.
Moser, G., & Uzzell, D. (2003). Environmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0517
Naghi Zadeh, M., & Ostadi, M. (2014). Comparative Study of the Concept and Process of Perception in Philosophy and Environmental Psychology and Its Application in Urban Design. Islamic Architecture Researches, 1(3), 3–14. SID: https://sid.ir/paper/248354/fa[in persian].
Nasir Salami, M. R., & Soahangir, S. (2013). Strategies for Enhancing Human-Environment Interaction Quality Using an Environmental Psychology Approach. Psychological Studies, 5(19), 0–0. SID: https://sid.ir/paper/486909/fa[in persian].
Nathan, A., Villanueva, K., Rozek, J., Davern, M., Gunn, L., Trapp, G., Boulangé, C., & Christian, H. (2018). The role of the built environment on health across the life course: a call for CollaborACTION. In (Vol. 32, pp. 1460-1468): Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
Neo, S. M. (2019). Interrelationships between environmental psychological factors and environmental behaviour among Malaysians.
Pagano, C. C., Day, B., & Hartman, L. S. (2021). An Argument Framework for Ecological Psychology and Architecture Design. Technology Architecture and Design, 5(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2021.1863665
Pandithasekara, D., Sumanasiri, E. A. G., & Perényi, Á. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Sustainability Control Systems on Employees’ Green Creativity: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment and Sustainability Learning Capabilities. Sustainability.
Pasini, M., Brondino, M., Trombin, R., & Filippi, Z. (2021). A participatory interior design approach for a restorative work environment: a research-intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 718446.
Pearson, D., & Gorman, J. T. (2023). Acknowledging Landscape Connection: Using Sense of Place and Cultural and Customary Landscape Management to Enhance Landscape Ecological Theoretical Frameworks. Land.
Popova, O. (2023). Fundamental changes in the determinants of western ecopsychology at the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. Personality and Environmental Issues.
Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., & Rivlin, L. G. (1970). Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting. Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York.
Putri, N. E., Helmi, H., Noer, M., & Yossyafra, Y. (2023). The Social and Political Factors on the Decision-Making Process in Land Acquisition for Sicincin-Padang Toll Road Construction, West Sumatera. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science).
Quesnel, D., Stepanova, E. R., Aguilar, I. A., Pennefather, P., & Riecke, B. E. (2018). Creating AWE: artistic and scientific practices in research-based design for exploring a profound immersive installation. 2018 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM),
Ramzy, N. S. (2015). Sustainable spaces with psychological connotation: Historical architecture as reference book for biomimetic models with biophilic qualities. Archnet-IJAR, 9(2), 248-267.
Richardson, M., & Butler, C. W. (2022). Nature connectedness and biophilic design. Building Research and Information, 50(1-2), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2021.2006594
Riggs, L. W., & Hellyer-Riggs, S. (2019). Eco-Psychological and Phenomenological Approach to Sustainability. European Journal of Sustainable Development.
Roessler, K. K. (2012). Healthy Architecture! Can environments evoke emotional responses? Global journal of health science, 4(4), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v4n4p83
Ross, M., & Mason, G. J. (2017). The effects of preferred natural stimuli on humans’ affective states, physiological stress and mental health, and the potential implications for well-being in captive animals. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 83, 46-62.
Ruzow Holland, A. H. (2014). Citizen-led, comprehensive land use planning in New York’s Adirondack Park. Rural Society, 23(2), 133-150.
Saheb-Alamari, S., & Khazenizadeh, Z. (2021). Examining Environmental Psychology Criteria in the Design of Tranquility Villages. National Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering, Urban Planning and the Horizons of Islamic Art in the Statement of the Second Step of the Revolution, Tabriz. https://civilica.com/doc/1252286[in persian].
Salari, M., & Mahdavi, A. (2016). Investigating the Impact of Environmental Psychology on Behavioral Patterns and the Realization of Culture (Case Study: Mahani Neighborhood of Kerman). National Conference on Tourism Culture and Urban Identity. SID: https://sid.ir/paper/874356/fa[in persian].
Sarie, F., Muhtadi, M. A., & Fildansyah, R. (2023). Efforts to Enhance Anthropological Insights on Sustainable Practices in Human-Environmental Interactions in Central Java. West Science Social and Humanities Studies.
Semeraro, T., Scarano, A., Buccolieri, R., Santino, A., & Aarrevaara, E. (2021). Planning of Urban Green Spaces: An Ecological Perspective on Human Benefits. Land.
Shams Esfand Abad, H. (2014). Environmental Psychology. Tehran: SAMT Publications[in persian].
Soderlund, J., & Newman, P. (2015). Biophilic architecture: a review of the rationale and outcomes. AIMS Environmental Science, 2(4), 950-969. https://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2015.4.950
Söderlund, J., & Newman, P. (2017). Improving mental health in prisons through biophilic design. The Prison Journal, 97(6), 750-772.
Song, C., Ikei, H., & Miyazaki, Y. (2016). Physiological effects of nature therapy: A review of the research in Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(8), 781-781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080781
Sörqvist, P. (2016). Grand Challenges in Environmental Psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.
Steg, L. (2016). Values, Norms, and Intrinsic Motivation to Act Proenvironmentally. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085947
Tabrizi, M. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis from Deductive and Inductive Approaches. Social Sciences Quarterly, 21(64), 105–138. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjss.2014.344[in persian].
Taheri, N., & Ranjbaran, M. (2020). Examining Environmental Psychology Components in the Formation of Urban Spaces (Case Study: Shohada Square, Jahrom). 1st Engineering and Technology Conference, Tabriz. https://civilica.com/doc/1217908[in persian].
Tahoun, Z. N. A. (2019). Awareness assessment of biophilic design principles application. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,
Tam, K. P., & Chan, H. W. (2017). Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behavior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 213-223.
Tam, K.-P. (2020). Understanding the psychology X politics interaction behind environmental activism: The roles of governmental trust, density of environmental NGOs, and democracy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101330.
Tam, K.-P., & Milfont, T. L. (2020). Towards cross-cultural environmental psychology: A state-of-the-art review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101474-101474.
Tan, P. Y. (2017). Perspectives on Greening of Cities Through an Ecological Lens.
Tran, B. (2016). Psychological (and emotional) architecture: The values and benefits of nature-based architecture - biophilia. In Cultural Influences on Architecture (pp. 200-230). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1744-3.ch008
Vardopoulos, I. (2023). Adaptive Reuse for Sustainable Development and Land Use: A Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis Estimating Key Determinants of Public Perceptions. Heritage.
Voghera, A., & Negrini, G. (2016). Parks and landscape: Land use plan experimentation for biodiversity.
Vogt, C. A., & Marans, R. W. (2003). Open space neighborhoods: residents' views on new forms of development. Journal of park and recreation administration, 21, 50-70.
Wang, X.-J., & Kang, J. (2023). Decision Making and Influencing Factors in Withdrawal of Rural Residential Land-Use Rights in Suzhou, Anhui Province, China. Land.
White, R., & Stoecklin, V. (1998). Children's outdoor play & learning environments: Returning to nature. Early Childhood News, 11(April), 2004-2004. http://www.naturalplaygrounds.com/documents/NaturalPlaygroundsDotCom_Outdoor_Play_Environments.pdf%5Cnhttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/Randy_White/publication/267374472_Children's_Outdoor_Play_Learning_Environments_Returning_to_Nature/links/545141ec0c
Wijaksono, S. (2024). Passive designs of low-income housing with natural ventilation in tropical region. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,
William, R., Endres, A., & Stillwell, A. S. (2020). Integrating Green Infrastructure Into Stormwater Policy: Reliability, Watershed Management, and Environmental Psychology as Holistic Tools for Success. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy.
Williams, D. R. (2004a). Environmental psychology: Human responses and relationships to natural landscapes.
Williams, D. R. (2004a). Human responses and relationships to natural landscapes.pdf. Society and natural resources: A summary of knowledge., 227.248-227.248.
Xie, H., Sun, Q., & Song, W. (2024). Exploring the Ecological Effects of Rural Land Use Changes: A Bibliometric Overview. Land, 13(3), 303.
Yin, J., Arfaei, N., MacNaughton, P., Catalano, P. J., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, J. D. (2019). Effects of biophilic interventions in office on stress reaction and cognitive function: A randomized crossover study in virtual reality. Indoor air, 29(6), 1028-1039.
Zare, G., Faizi, M., Baharvand, M., & Masnavi, M. (2021). A Review of Biophilic Design Conception Implementation in Architecture. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 21(3), 16-36. https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.vol21no3.2
Zoppi, C. (2020). Ecosystem Services, Green Infrastructure and Spatial Planning. Sustainability.#